The goal of management should be to maximize the share price for the current shareholders. … However, if the current management cannot increase the value of the firm beyond the bid price, and no other higher bids come in, then management is not acting in the interests of the shareholders by fighting the offer.
When management and employees are also shareholders, they are typically more motivated to protect shareholder interests as their own. This helps to protect a company from mismanagement and weak employee productivity.
Several mechanisms are used to motivate managers to act in the shareholders’ best interests. These in- clude (1) the threat of firing, (2) the threat of takeover, and (3) managerial compensation plans.
The “agency view” of corporations argues that the decisions rights (or control) of a corporation should be entrusted to a manager, so that the manager can act in the interest of shareholders. … They also arise when managers have personal objectives that are different from the goal of maximizing shareholder profit.
Conflicts can occur when a director-shareholder, who as a director is accountable to all company owners, makes an operational decision that some other shareholders disagree with. It is often difficult to ascertain whether he was carrying out his duty as a director or acting in his interests as an owner.
Can our goal of maximizing the value of the stock conflict with other?
Answer and Explanation: Our goal of maximizing the value of the shareholders’ wealth can conflict with other goals, and often does. … Any business faces sacrifices, in terms of how much wealth it produces versus how many resources it can devote to other goals, such as protecting the environment or protecting people.
Another way of managing the conflict is by ensuring that the board of directors includes a shareholder with skills and expertise in the affairs of the company. This shareholder will serve as the shareholders “watchdog” and will safeguard the shareholders’ interests.
The concept of having shareholders for the companies is to make the companies accountable for their actions. As mentioned above, the shareholders are usually represented on the board of directors and the board of directors acts as the custodian for shareholder interests.
Stockholders can always vote with their feet — that is, sell the stock if they are unhappy with the financial results. Their selling can put downward pressure on the stock price.
What is the primary purpose of awarding stock options to managers?
The main goal in granting stock options is, of course, to tie pay to performance—to ensure that executives profit when their companies prosper and suffer when they flounder.
What are examples of a possible result of the conflict of interest between shareholders and corporate managers? Managers using company resources for personal benefit. Managers faking earnings to temporarily boost the stock price. Managers paying themselves excessive salaries.
What are the techniques stockholders can use to motivate managers to maximize their stocks long run prices?
What are three techniques stockholders can use to motivate managers to maximize their stock’s long-run price? (1) Reasonable compensation packagews (2) Firing managers who are not performing well (3) The threat of hostile takeovers.
What is the primary conflict of interest between directors and management?
Major conflicts of interest could include, but are not restricted to, salaries and perks, misappropriation of company assets, self-dealing, appropriating corporate opportunities, insider trading, and neglecting board work.
The Friedman doctrine, also called shareholder theory or stockholder theory, is a normative theory of business ethics advanced by economist Milton Friedman which holds that a firm’s sole responsibility is to its shareholders. … As such, the goal of the firm is to maximize returns to shareholders.